REGISTRO DOI: 10.69849/revistaft/ar10202511120213
Antonio Clareti Pereira¹
Abstract
The mining sector has long been a central driver of economic growth and spatial transformation in resource-rich regions. Nevertheless, its impacts on urban systems and local development remain deeply ambivalent. Between 2000 and 2025, the global mining landscape underwent significant changes, driven by commodity supercycles, technological advancements, environmental governance, and community resistance. This critical review examines how mining activities reshape urban and regional dynamics across different scales — from boomtown expansion and infrastructure development to social inequality, environmental degradation, and post-mining transitions. Drawing from multidisciplinary literature in geography, economics, environmental studies, and urban planning, the paper identifies key patterns of socio-spatial transformation linked to extractive economies. The analysis highlights three major dimensions: (i) socioeconomic restructuring and labor market shifts; (ii) environmental and infrastructural legacies; and (iii) governance mechanisms for sustainable territorial development. The review concludes by proposing an integrative framework for future research and policy design that aligns mining-based development with sustainable urban and regional planning goals.
Keywords. Mining cities; Extractive economies; Urbanization; Regional development; Sustainability; Post-mining transition; Environmental governance; Spatial planning; Latin America; Global South.
Graphical Abstract
1. Introduction
The extraction of mineral resources has long been a key driver of economic growth and industrialization worldwide, especially in regions rich in metals, coal, and non-metallic minerals. Mining supports infrastructure development, construction, energy production, and manufacturing supply chains, making it central to national and regional economies. At the same time, many resource-rich areas have undergone rapid urban transformation, characterized by the emergence of “mining cities” and boomtowns, new infrastructure routes, and accelerated demographic growth in previously remote regions. Rapid urbanization in resource-rich areas— across Latin America, Africa, and Asia—has strengthened the connections between extractive industries and urban growth, changing settlement patterns, regional links, and labor markets.
However, this process presents a paradox: while mining can generate prosperity, jobs, and infrastructure, it often also leads to inequality, social fragmentation, and environmental harm. The so-called “resource curse” demonstrates how resource-rich regions may face challenges in human development, governance, and economic diversification (Savoia & Sen, 2021). Simultaneously, the “boomtown effect” explains how rapid increases in investment and population in mining areas can strain housing, services, infrastructure, governance, and social cohesion (Udelsmann Rodrigues et al., 2021). In Latin America, primarily, the combination of commodity booms, urban growth, and extractive frontiers has led to unique socio-spatial dynamics, where territorial development, urban planning, and sustainability are closely linked yet often addressed separately (Arboleda, 2016).
Despite the increasing amount of research on mining and its economic, social, and environmental effects, a gap remains in integrated frameworks that directly connect extractive industries, urban planning, and sustainability transitions at the city-region level. Many studies tend to focus either on macroeconomic analyses of resource dependence and governance (Savoia & Sen, 2021) or case studies of boomtown effects (Udelsmann Rodrigues et al., 2021), with fewer adopting a comprehensive approach that places mining-driven urbanization within regional development, spatial planning, and sustainability pathways, especially from 2000 to 2025. To push this field forward, this review aims to synthesize and critically assess the transformative interactions among mining, cities, and development across three key areas: (i) socioeconomic restructuring, (ii) environmental and spatial legacies, and (iii) institutional and governance challenges. The focus is mainly on Latin America, but it also includes comparative global evidence from 2000 to 2025.
This article presents a narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed journals, policy reports, and empirical case studies published between 2000 and 2025. The review focuses on works exploring the links between mining, urbanization, regional development, and sustainability. We searched databases such as Scopus and Web of Science with keywords like “mining cities,” “boomtowns,” “urbanization extractive,” “resource curse,” and “post-mining transition.” The collected literature was then organized thematically into three core areas and critically examined to identify patterns, gaps, and potential future research directions.
2. Methodology
2.1. Search strategy
We performed a systematic literature search using Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2025. The search strings included both controlled vocabulary and free-text terms to identify studies related to extractive activities and urban or regional dynamics.
(“mining city” OR “mining region” OR “resource-based city”) AND (“urban development” OR “sustainability” OR “regional planning”)
Screening and reporting followed good-practice guidelines based on PRISMA 2020 for transparency in review workflows (Page et al., 2021). Because our synthesis combines qualitative and mixed-methods evidence, we used thematic synthesis procedures (coding, descriptive themes, analytical themes) as described by Thomas and Harden (2008) to organize findings across various study designs.
2.2. Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
Inclusion consists of peer-reviewed studies that explicitly explore mining–urban interactions, development policies, or governance at the city or regional level. These studies include comparative or single-case analyses that connect extractive activities to socioeconomic, environmental, spatial, or institutional outcomes, such as resource-based cities, boomtowns, or post-mining transitions (Jiao et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2008).
Exclusion criteria include technical papers that focus only on unit operations or mineral processing without addressing urban or regional aspects, opinion pieces lacking empirical evidence, and items that do not provide enough methodological detail for evaluation.
2.3. Analytical approach
We used a thematic synthesis (Thomas & Harden, 2008) to categorize evidence into four dimensions: economic, social, environmental, and spatial. To interpret cross-cutting findings, we relied on two complementary frameworks.
- The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—particularly SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), SDG 11 (sustainable cities), and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production)—serve as global benchmarks for sustainability (UN, 2015; Sachs et al., 2019); and
- Resource-Based City (RBC) theory, which conceptualizes cities whose development trajectories depend on extractive endowments, informs indicators and transition pathways (Yu et al., 2008; Jiao et al., 2021).
The PRISMA 2020 flowchart (Figure 1) outlines the process of identifying and screening literature in this review. Initially, 1,870 records were gathered from four key databases: Scopus (n = 530), Web of Science (n = 450), ScienceDirect (n = 320), and Google Scholar (n = 570), covering publications from 2000 to 2025. After removing duplicates and irrelevant entries, 250 records remained for full-text retrieval, though 20 were inaccessible.
Following a detailed eligibility review, 230 studies were evaluated against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of these, 180 were excluded because they focused solely on technical aspects or non-urban issues—such as mineral processing, extraction engineering, or laboratory tests — without regional analysis. Ultimately, 50 studies satisfied all the criteria and were included in the final synthesis.
This systematic selection guaranteed that the corpus represented a balanced mix of research on economic, social, environmental, and spatial aspects of mining-related urban development. The prevalence of publications after 2010 reflects the growing academic and policy focus on sustainability transitions, post-mining regeneration, and territorial governance of extractive economies. Additionally, the database underscores the interdisciplinary essence of the field, encompassing geography, regional economics, environmental policy, and urban planning.
2.4. Data Extraction and Analysis
Selected studies were categorized based on thematic dimensions.
- Governance and institutional frameworks
- spatial planning and land use transitions,
- social and economic impacts, and
- post-mining and adaptive urban regeneration.
3. Conceptual framework: mining, urbanization, and development
3.1. Definitions: “Mining cities” and “Resource-based urbanization”
“Mining cities” are urban areas primarily shaped by the extraction and processing of minerals or energy resources, which significantly influence their economy, labor markets, and overall structure (Jiao et al., 2021). Resource-based urbanization expands this concept, encompassing broader territorial processes in which extractive industries play a crucial role in urban growth and demographic shifts (Strüver & Kleemann, 2023). These cities serve as important hubs in global commodity networks but are often exposed to risks such as price volatility, corporate disinvestment, and environmental damage (Arboleda, 2016).
3.2. Evolution of Mining Settlements
Mining settlements have evolved from temporary camps that supported early resource extraction into company towns, offering housing, services, and infrastructure. Over time, these settlements have grown into complex urban systems characterized by diverse economies and governance structures. This evolution reflects increasing spatial and institutional complexity, while still relying heavily on resource capital and external decision-making, as noted by Sandström (2021). and Frederiksen (2020). In Latin America, the legacy of large-scale mining continues to influence city architecture, labor practices, and social segregation in places such as Antofagasta, Belo Horizonte, and Calama (Devenin & Bianchi, 2019).
3.3. Theoretical Models
Four theoretical approaches form the basis of analyzing mining-urban interactions:
- Staple Theory (Watkins, 1963): suggests that economies focused on primary exports tend to develop weak backward and forward connections, which restricts industrial diversification.
- Resource Curse Hypothesis (Auty, 1993; Sachs & Warner, 2001): argues that resource abundance can undermine institutional quality and long-term growth.
- Dutch Disease (Corden & Neary, 1982): describes how resource booms can cause real exchange rates to appreciate and weaken competitiveness in other sectors, leading to regional imbalances that appear in urban systems.
- Urban Extractivism (Streule, 2023; Calderón-Seguel, 2024) highlights how extractive logics of accumulation—such as land speculation, infrastructure expansion, and enclosure—spread into urban governance, transforming cities well beyond mine sites.
3.4. Interdependence between Mining Infrastructure and Regional Growth
Mining requires substantial investment in energy, transportation, and water infrastructure, often driving regional development and urban growth (Turok & McGranahan, 2019). However, these advantages are often unevenly spread, leading to increased spatial inequality and heightened socio-ecological vulnerability (Chien & Knoble, 2024). Consequently, the intertwined development of extractive activities and urban systems necessitates integrated planning to avoid enclave-like development and bolster territorial resilience (Bebbington et al., 2018).
3.5. Relationship between extractive capital and urban morphology
Extractive industries shape urban landscapes through company-built housing, segregated neighborhoods, and industrial zoning. Over time, deindustrialization and mine closures can lead to fragmented areas and underutilized infrastructure, necessitating regeneration policies that align with the post-mining city model (Prieto et al., 2022). The relationship between corporate investment cycles and spatial layout influences whether mining cities move toward sustainable diversification or remain dependent.
3.6. Conceptual schematic
Figure 2 presents the conceptual framework of this review. It illustrates how mining, infrastructure, urban growth, and regional development are interconnected subsystems within a dynamic feedback loop. The diagram highlights that commodity cycles act as major external drivers: rising global demand and prices lead to increased investment in extractive industries, which then accelerate infrastructure development and urban expansion near mining frontiers. Although this process can generate short-term prosperity and employment, it may also perpetuate long-term structural dependency.
The lower part of the diagram introduces sustainability transitions, emphasizing three persistent legacies:
- Environmental legacies, such as degraded land, pollution, and water stress.
- Social inequality, reflecting the uneven distribution of mining benefits, and
- Spatial lock-in, where urban form and infrastructure stay reliant on extractive capital (Frederiksen, 2020; Chien & Knoble, 2024).
Arrows connecting these nodes indicate bidirectional causality: extractive growth stimulates urban expansion, which in turn leads to increased infrastructure demands and influences governance decisions. The dashed lines from Regional Development to Sustainability Transitions illustrate adaptive or corrective pathways—such as policy measures, diversification strategies, and planning tools—that support mining cities in transforming into more inclusive and resilient communities. Development.
In essence, the figure depicts mining-led urbanization as a complex adaptive system rather than a linear one, with economic, social, environmental, and spatial factors co-evolving. This systemic perspective provides a theoretical foundation for evaluating the sustainability of resource-based urban growth models, particularly in emerging economies undergoing rapid industrialization and territorial transformation.
4. Economic and social dimensions
4.1. Economic growth and diversification
Mining continues to play a decisive role in shaping local and national economies, particularly in resource-rich developing countries. In nations such as Brazil, Chile, South Africa, and Australia, the sector makes significant contributions to GDP, export revenues, and infrastructure investment (Hilson & McQuilken, 2014; Turok & McGranahan, 2019). However, this growth often exhibits high volatility tied to international commodity cycles and price shocks, creating boom-and-bust patterns in employment and fiscal revenues (Auty, 1993; Venables, 2016).
At the local level, mining cities typically experience rapid employment concentration during expansion phases followed by contraction after resource depletion or technological change (Prieto et al., 2022). The extent to which these cities succeed in fostering economic diversification depends on governance structures, local capacity, and reinvestment of mining rents into other productive sectors (Strüver & Kleemann, 2023). Examples such as Kalgoorlie (Australia) and Johannesburg (South Africa) demonstrate how early diversification into services, education, and logistics can mitigate dependency. Conversely, mono-sectoral cities like Carajás (Brazil) face challenges transitioning to post-mining economies (Matlaba et al., 2024).
4.2. Social and Demographic Dynamics
Mining booms lead to significant migration and rapid urban expansion, often resulting in housing shortages and the emergence of informal settlements (Bebbington et al., 2018). The so-called “boomtown effect” can strain municipal services—such as health, education, and sanitation—particularly in peripheral areas with limited institutional capacity (Udelsmann Rodrigues et al., 2021).
Social inequality tends to increase during economic booms, with income disparities expanding between mining workers and informal laborers (Chien & Knoble, 2024). Gender disparities persist: men often occupy technical and managerial positions, while women are mostly confined to informal or service occupations (Hilson, 2016). Although some mining regions have adopted inclusive policies, such as community development agreements and local content initiatives, their implementation remains uneven.
Migration patterns further diversify the social fabric of mining cities, fostering hybrid identities that integrate industrial, rural, and indigenous cultures. Over time, these demographic shifts influence community relationships, political engagement, and urban governance (Frederiksen, 2020).
4.3. Case studies and comparative overview
Table 1 compares four key mining cities—Carajás (Brazil), Antofagasta (Chile), Johannesburg (South Africa), and Kalgoorlie (Australia)—to highlight the diversity of socioeconomic paths among resource-dependent urban economies. The chosen cases originate from different continents and development backgrounds. However, they all share common traits, including reliance on resources, uneven diversification, and high exposure to the dynamics of global commodity markets.
Table 1. Comparative socioeconomic indicators of selected mining cities (2020–2024). Adapted from Prieto et al. (2022); Matlaba et al. (2024); Devenin & Bianchi (2022); Australian Bureau of Statistics (2024); UNDP (2023).
Carajás (Brazil) heavily depends on the mining industry, with 62% of its GDP and over a third of employment linked to iron ore mining. Although it has a relatively high HDI of 0.754, its low diversification index of 0.42 shows it is vulnerable to market volatility and resource depletion. The city’s population grew rapidly (+27% from 2010 to 2020), driven by migrants seeking high-paying mining jobs, which has increased housing shortages and strained public services—typical signs of a boomtown (Matlaba et al., 2024).
Antofagasta (Chile) exhibits a relatively more balanced economic structure. While copper still accounts for 45% of the local GDP, initiatives to diversify into logistics, education, and renewable energy services have somewhat reduced economic dependence, as reflected in a diversification index of 0.58. Its HDI stands at 0.822, among the highest in Latin America, illustrating how continuous reinvestment of mining rents and effective regional governance can enhance living standards, even for economies heavily reliant on resource extraction (Devenin & Bianchi, 2019).
Johannesburg (South Africa) exemplifies a mature post-mining transition. Once the global center of gold extraction, its mining share of GDP has decreased to 15%, accompanied by significant diversification into finance, technology, and logistics (index = 0.73). However, legacies of apartheid-era spatial inequality and environmental degradation remain, showing that economic transformation does not automatically lead to social equity (Chien & Knoble, 2024).
Kalgoorlie, Australia, exemplifies a balanced approach: although mining accounts for 32% of the local GDP, strategic investments in education, tourism, and infrastructure have enhanced the region’s resilience. Its HDI of 0.925 and modest population increase (+11%) indicate that stability in institutions, transparent governance, and reinvesting royalties can promote long-term prosperity and sustainability in traditional mining areas (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2024).
Cross-comparison reveals a distinct gradient among emerging and advanced economies in terms of institutional quality, diversification, and social outcomes. Countries with higher HDI scores and stronger diversification indices tend to have lower GDP reliance on mining, supporting Watkins’ (1963) staple-trap avoidance theory, which is also a focus of recent resource-curse research (Sachs & Warner, 2001; Venables, 2016). Nonetheless, even diversified economies face persistent social inequalities and environmental challenges, indicating that structural transformation requires more than just economic adjustments. It necessitates comprehensive planning, gender-inclusive policies, and effective territorial governance to manage resource-driven urban expansion effectively (Hilson, 2016; Prieto et al., 2022).
Figure 3 illustrates the cyclical and non-linear trajectories of socioeconomic development in mining-dependent urban regions. Rather than a straightforward progression from resource discovery to post-mining recovery, it depicts these cities as cycling through recurring stages shaped by global commodity fluctuations, local governance, and social transformations.
The first stage — Resource Dependence — is characterized by a high concentration in specific sectors, inflows of foreign investment, and swift infrastructure growth. While this stage often boosts short-term growth, it also raises the risk of exposure to external price fluctuations and fiscal instability (Auty, 1993; Venables, 2016).
As economic growth accelerates, employment rates and incomes rise significantly, driving urban expansion, increasing housing needs, and stimulating growth in the service sector. Nevertheless, this phase also tends to widen social inequality: the income disparity between skilled and unskilled workers increases, and higher migration levels strain housing markets, resulting in more informal settlements (Bebbington et al., 2018; Hilson & McQuilken, 2014).
Cities can transition into a diversification phase over time by reinvesting mining revenues in secondary industries, education, and infrastructure. Successful examples, like Johannesburg and Kalgoorlie, are often associated with solid institutional frameworks, fiscal transparency, and regional innovation systems (Prieto et al., 2022). In contrast, failure to diversify results in the ongoing “staple trap” of reliance on extractive industries, as described by Watkins (1963) and further discussed in the Resource Curse debate (Sachs & Warner, 2001).
The Sustainability Transition stage involves efforts to reduce environmental and social externalities through inclusive planning, environmental remediation, and gender-sensitive governance (Hilson, 2016). In practice, these policies determine whether the system advances toward Post-Mining Regeneration—a phase of urban repurposing and economic renewal—or falls back into renewed cycles of dependence and degradation.
The diagram’s arrows depict feedback loops between economic, social, and environmental factors. Upward arrows represent positive developments such as diversification, capacity building, and institutional strengthening, whereas downward arrows indicate a regression to dependency, inequality, or environmental stress. This visual emphasizes that achieving sustainable post-mining transitions depends on targeted policy measures that balance immediate economic benefits with enduring social resilience.
By framing mining cities as adaptive socioeconomic systems, Figure 3 integrates insights from resource economics, urban sociology, and sustainability science. It offers a heuristic model to interpret empirical differences observed in Table 1, illustrating how governance quality and reinvestment strategies fundamentally determine whether mining prosperity serves as a foundation for inclusive development or results in a transient boom.
5. Environmental and spatial dimensions
5.1. Environmental impacts
Mining cities are closely linked to their surrounding extractive regions, forming intricate environmental interfaces between industrial activity and urban life. Common impacts include land degradation, water pollution, and air contamination, resulting from open-pit mining, tailings disposal, and mineral processing. Research from South America and Southern Africa indicates that hazards such as tailings dam failures, acid mine drainage, and dust emissions persist, particularly in peri-urban zones (Cowie et al., 2019; Mancini & Sala, 2018).
At the boundary between the mine and the city, environmental justice emerges as a crucial concern. Low-income communities situated near waste dumps or smelters frequently face disproportionate exposure to toxic metals and particulate matter, illustrating environmental inequality in resource-dependent urban areas (Agyeman et al., 2016). Furthermore, abandoned or orphaned mines on the city’s outskirts continue to be ongoing sources of contamination and physical hazards; their remediation requires coordinated legal, technical, and financial efforts that exceed local capacities (Hilson & Hilson, 2022).
The legacy of pollution also affects urban planning and property values. Former industrial zones—often located near transportation routes—become brownfields, limiting redevelopment options until costly cleanup efforts are completed. These environmental legacies emphasize the importance of viewing mining not just as a separate activity but as a long-term land-use change within metropolitan ecosystems.
5.2. Urban and regional planning
Spatially, mining cities exhibit expansion patterns that are strongly influenced by infrastructure networks and commodity cycles. During boom periods, rapid investments in transportation, power, and housing promote horizontal urban sprawl. When prices fall, stalled projects and underutilized infrastructure remain as spatial remnants of extractive cycles (Hinojosa et al., 2022).
Urban morphology usually reflects the hierarchical logic of extraction, with industrial centers near processing facilities, separated workers’ neighborhoods, and distant administrative or commercial areas. These patterns lead to social fragmentation and inefficient land use. To address these issues, planners are increasingly incorporating post-mining landscapes into longterm territorial plans, transforming pits and tailings areas into spaces for recreation, solar energy, or ecological restoration (Prieto et al., 2022).
Integrated regional planning is crucial for aligning mining infrastructure with broader development objectives—ensuring connectivity beyond extractive value chains and facilitating diversification pathways. Spatial data analysis and remote sensing tools now allow planners to predict land-use changes and develop adaptive reuse strategies (Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, 2017).
5.3. Green transitions
Recent decades have seen an increasing focus on green transitions in mining cities. Strategies include urban greening, circular economy practices, and brownfield redevelopment, all aimed at turning degraded areas into productive or ecological assets. The concept of urban mining—recycling valuable materials from industrial waste or decommissioned facilities— illustrates the circular transformation of extractive landscapes (Gedam et al., 2021).
Successful reclamation examples demonstrate the potential for large-scale environmental restoration. In Antofagasta (Chile), saline tailings areas have been turned into public parks and renewable-energy testing sites (Devenin & Bianchi, 2019). In Germany’s Ruhr Valley, transforming former coal mines into cultural and recreational centers—such as Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord—has become a worldwide standard for post-industrial renewal (Zhang et al., 2020). These projects demonstrate how legacy mining regions can evolve into hubs for sustainability, integrating environmental restoration, heritage conservation, and inclusive urban planning.
Ultimately, green transitions rely on coherent governance frameworks that combine environmental restoration with social equity and economic renewal. Linking post-mining regeneration to the UN Sustainable Development Goals—especially SDGs 11, 12, and 15— provides a way to turn environmental liabilities into assets for future urban resilience.
Figure 4 illustrates the interconnected cycle linking extraction activities, environmental damage, urban growth, spatial planning, rehabilitation, and sustainability transitions in mining cities. The conceptual model illustrates how environmental and spatial processes interact and evolve through successive phases, forming a feedback loop that links ecological conditions, infrastructure development, and territorial dynamics governance.
The initial phase, Extraction, is the primary driver of land-use change. Large mining operations change landforms, clear vegetation, and release pollutants into air, water, and soil. These activities lead to the next phase, characterized by land degradation, which is marked by impacts such as tailings accumulation, dust dispersion, and diminished ecosystem services, thereby increasing environmental risks (Cowie et al., 2019; Mancini & Sala, 2018).
In the third stage, known as Urban Expansion, economic growth and migration driven by mining lead to rapid settlement growth and infrastructure sprawl around extraction sites. This growth frequently occurs with limited environmental oversight, resulting in fragmented landscapes and encroachment on contaminated zones. It establishes a spatial interface where human settlements and industrial activities coexist in delicate proximity—posing one of the primary environmental justice challenges for resource-dependent regions (Agyeman et al., 2016).
Spatial Planning acts as a corrective phase where governance mechanisms strive to integrate mining land uses into coherent territorial frameworks. Effective planning can transform extractive infrastructure into regional assets—such as repurposing transport corridors or rehabilitating tailings zones as ecological buffers (Hinojosa et al., 2022). The quality of planning institutions largely determines whether the transition toward regeneration is successful or falls back into cycles of degradation.
The next phase, Rehabilitation, includes active efforts such as soil restoration, water treatment, reforestation, and landscape revalorization, aimed at restoring ecological functions and enabling new urban uses (Zhang et al., 2020; Gedam et al., 2021). Ultimately, Sustainability refers to the long-term equilibrium where environmental recovery, economic diversity, and social inclusion mutually reinforce each other.
The circular arrows in the diagram illustrate adaptive feedback: successful planning and rehabilitation lead the system toward sustainable urban renewal, while failures in governance or investment cause it to regress into degradation. This highlights that the environmental health of mining cities depends not only on geology or technology but also on policy coherence, spatial foresight, and citizen engagement. By presenting urban-extractive interactions as a continuous feedback loop, the model emphasizes the importance of integrated governance that can synchronize ecological restoration with socioeconomic change (OECD, 2020).
6. Governance, policy, and institutional frameworks
6.1. Governance challenges
Governance in mining cities operates at the intersection of corporate strategies, state regulation, and local development planning, resulting in overlapping jurisdictions and power imbalances. A common issue is how mining royalties are allocated and the extent of fiscal independence municipalities have. In many Latin American and African regions, royalties are collected nationally but transferred irregularly to local governments, resulting in volatility in municipal budgets and reducing their ability for long-term planning (Arellano-Yanguas, 2011; Hinojosa, 2020). The uneven distribution of mining rents often intensifies social conflicts, especially when resource wealth fails to yield visible improvements in infrastructure, housing, or services. Municipalities near major mines see significant population growth but lack adequate fiscal transfers, forcing them to rely on temporary agreements with private companies (Prieto et al., 2022). Conversely, regions with revenue-stabilization funds, as seen in Chile and Australia, are better equipped to manage cyclical fluctuations and reinvest mining income into diversification efforts (Oyarzo & Paredes, 2023).
Coordination between mining companies and local authorities remains a major governance gap. Corporate projects often progress more quickly than municipal planning processes, resulting in spatial mismatches between industrial infrastructure and social services.
As a result, the success of local governance depends on participatory mechanisms that can align private investment with shared territorial goals (Bebbington et al., 2018).
6.2. Policy instruments
Over the past twenty years, different policy tools have been implemented to tackle coordination failures. Local Content policies aim to enhance domestic participation in extractive supply chains, promoting employment, procurement, and technology transfer (Ovadia, 2016). Meanwhile, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives aim to mitigate social and environmental impacts by supporting community projects, although their voluntary approach sometimes limits their impact (Hilson, 2012).
Recent frameworks, such as Local Development Agreements (LDAs) in Peru and Ghana, require companies to co-finance infrastructure, training, and environmental restoration (Nwapi, 2017). Their success relies on transparent monitoring, equitable negotiations, and the capacity of local institutions to handle complex multi-stakeholder processes.
At the regional level, integrated planning models are now linking extractive activities with infrastructure corridors, logistics hubs, and special economic zones (Turok & McGranahan, 2019). These strategies can reduce dependence on extractive industries by integrating mining into varied territorial economies, as long as environmental safeguards and social participation are formally established.
6.3. International and comparative perspectives
Comparative studies suggest that the level of institutional maturity has a significant impact on development outcomes in extractive industries. In Latin America, governance systems tend to be highly centralized, depending largely on national transfers and providing limited control over royalties for municipalities. Chile’s mining cities, such as Antofagasta, illustrate a trend toward gradual decentralization and greater transparency. Meanwhile, Peru’s Canon Minero has increased local revenues but has also widened the gap between mining and non-mining areas (Hinojosa, 2020).
In Africa, resource governance frameworks, such as Zambia’s Mines and Minerals Development Act and Ghana’s Minerals Development Fund Act (2016), have enhanced fiscal accountability, although enforcement remains inconsistent. Challenges such as limited institutional capacity and political interference frequently hinder redistribution efforts and long-term planning (Hilson & Hilson, 2022; Ovadia, 2016).
By contrast, OECD countries (e.g., Canada, Australia) exhibit more predictable regulatory environments, characterized by royalty stabilization funds, robust environmental licensing systems, and collaborative governance between industry and municipalities (Prieto et al., 2022). Canadian provinces, for instance, use Impact and Benefit Agreements (IBAs) to negotiate with Indigenous communities, ensuring their participation in decision-making and sharing benefits (Prno & Slocombe, 2012).
Overall, cross-regional comparison reveals a continuum between extractive dependence and institutional resilience. Where governance is transparent, participatory, and technically competent, mining can catalyse broader regional development; where it is fragmented and reactive, social conflict and inequality tend to persist.
Figure 5 synthesises the institutional relationships that define how extractive activities are governed at the local and regional levels. The diagram conceptualises governance as a multi-level coordination system linking fiscal flows (royalties and rents), institutional mechanisms (local governments and planning bodies), corporate instruments (CSR and Local Development Agreements), and long-term sustainability outcomes. Each component represents a critical node in the transformation of mineral wealth into durable territorial development.
The first component, Royalties and Fiscal Flows, serves as the main channel for redistributing resource rents. The effectiveness and fairness of this process depend on the design of fiscal systems and the ability of subnational institutions to handle revenues transparently. Evidence from Chile and Peru indicates that, while royalty transfers can enhance local investment, they often create fiscal dependency and expenditure fluctuations in municipalities without diversification strategies (Hinojosa, 2020; Oyarzo & Paredes, 2023).
The second layer, Local Institutions, includes municipal governments, planning agencies, and civil society organizations responsible for turning financial inflows into social outcomes. Their success depends on administrative capacity, inter-agency coordination, and citizen participation. Poor institutional alignment often results in fragmented decision-making and duplicated projects, which can weaken the developmental potential of mining revenues (Arellano-Yanguas, 2011; Prieto et al., 2022).
The third component—Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Local Development Agreements (LDAs)—illustrates how private actors contribute to social investment and infrastructure development. CSR programs, although common, are often discretionary and short-term, whereas LDAs create legally binding commitments for the shared funding of education, health, or environmental cleanup (Hilson, 2012; Nwapi, 2017). Nonetheless, without transparent monitoring and community oversight, these tools risk reinforcing patronclient relationships instead of empowering local governance.
Regional planning functions as a coordinating hub that connects fiscal and corporate initiatives to spatial and economic strategies. When implemented effectively, planning frameworks can incorporate mining activities into wider territorial networks—such as transport corridors, industrial parks, or innovation hubs—boosting resilience and connectivity (Turok & McGranahan, 2019). Conversely, the lack of planning results in enclave economies that are isolated from local value chains.
Ultimately, the Sustainable Development node embodies the core objective of this governance structure: fostering inclusive growth, environmental restoration, and institutional legitimacy. The feedback loops illustrated in the diagram demonstrate how governance outcomes influence future fiscal policies and corporate behavior, thereby creating a selfreinforcing system. Positive feedback enhances accountability, diversification, and community trust; negative feedback sustains dependency, conflict, and inequality.
Overall, Figure 5 highlights that the effectiveness of mining governance relies not only on resource endowment but also on institutional coherence, fiscal responsibility, and participatory planning. Sustainable outcomes occur when royalties, corporate obligations, and policy instruments are aligned within transparent, multi-stakeholder frameworks.
7. Emerging trends and future perspectives
The twenty-first century has brought about a significant shift in the relationship between mining, technology, and urban development. As digitalization, decarbonization, and circular economy concepts converge, mining cities are transforming from traditional extraction areas into interconnected technological hubs that balance global supply chains with local sustainability efforts.
7.1. Smart mining and digital urban management
The rise of Industry 4.0 has transformed both the operational and governance aspects of extractive regions. Innovative mining technologies, such as autonomous haulage, real-time sensors, artificial intelligence, and remote control systems, are redefining productivity and safety standards (Ediriweera & Wiewiora, 2021). Digital twins and predictive analytics now allow for continuous monitoring of tailings dams, energy use, and emissions, thereby reducing environmental risks (Azadi et al., 2020).
Parallel to this, digital urban management systems are emerging in mining cities to optimize water, energy, and waste cycles. Platforms that integrate GIS data with community feedback tools enable municipalities to manage expansion pressures, service delivery, and environmental performance in real time. Such systems, already piloted in Western Australia and northern Chile, point toward a data-driven governance model capable of linking industrial innovation to urban sustainability (Przeybilovicz & Cunha, 2024).
7.2. Energy transition minerals and new city frontiers
The global energy transition has shifted exploration and investment toward lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth elements, creating new mining frontiers in Argentina’s Lithium Triangle, central Africa, and northern Canada (Petavratzi et al., 2022; Hund et al., 2020). These “green rushes” are expanding urbanization into ecologically fragile zones—such as salt flats, high plateaus, and tropical forests—raising concerns about water security, biodiversity, and indigenous rights.
Emerging mining cities, such as Catamarca (Argentina) and Kolwezi (DRC), are experiencing rapid population growth but lack proper infrastructure and governance. These trends mirror historical boomtown cycles, implying that without proactive planning, energy transition minerals could repeat the resource curse they aim to resolve (Hinojosa et al., 2022). On the other hand, if managed with participatory frameworks and environmental safeguards, these cities could become models for low-carbon industrialization and equitable transition policies.
7.3. Post-extractive development and circular urbanism
A growing policy and academic agenda emphasizes post-extractive development strategies that reconceptualize mining territories as catalysts for innovation beyond the resource cycle. Concepts like circular urbanism and urban mining promote the recovery and reuse of industrial materials, infrastructure, and land to foster regenerative economies (Gedam et al., 2021).
Former industrial landscapes—ranging from Chile’s Atacama Desert to Germany’s Ruhr region—demonstrate how heritage preservation and ecological restoration can support cultural industries, renewable energy hubs, and eco-tourism (Zhang et al., 2020). In this sense, the shift from extractive to productive and regenerative cities depends on governance models that combine technological innovation, environmental design, and social inclusion.
7.4. Research gaps and innovation opportunities
Despite significant progress, important research gaps still exist. There is a need for cross-sectoral frameworks that combine mining, urban planning, and digital infrastructure policies into a single analytical perspective. Comparative empirical studies connecting smart mining with urban resilience are limited, especially in developing regions. Additionally, little is known about the social impacts of automation—such as labor displacement, gender dynamics, and local capacity building—within mining urban systems (Azadi et al., 2020).
Future research should investigate hybrid governance models that combine public, private, and community-based management, along with data interoperability standards for environmental and spatial monitoring. Incorporating artificial intelligence, life-cycle analysis, and participatory digital tools could lead to a new wave of “smart-sustainable mining cities,” aligning extractive innovation with global sustainability goals.
Figure 6 illustrates the evolving paths of mining cities as they enter the era of digitalization and decarbonization. The diagram explains how technological innovation, energy-transition minerals, and circular urban strategies are reshaping the spatial, economic, and governance principles of extractive territories. Instead of presenting a linear sequence, the framework proposes a cyclical transformation system that connects industrial, digital, and ecological realms.
The process starts with Smart Mining, where automation, robotics, artificial intelligence, and sensor-based monitoring transform operational efficiency and safety. These technologies reduce environmental impact and human exposure while providing unprecedented data on production, energy, and emissions (Ediriweera & Wiewiora, 2021). However, their adoption raises concerns about job replacement, digital inequality, and technological dependence, particularly in low-income regions where local capacities for data management and system integration are limited (Azadi et al., 2020).
The next stage, Digital Governance, goes beyond industrial control to include urban systems management. Mining cities are increasingly using digital dashboards, geospatial planning tools, and participatory online platforms to monitor infrastructure, environmental quality, and social needs in real time (Przeybilovicz & Cunha, 2024). This integration of industrial and urban data infrastructures marks a shift toward “platform urbanism,” where datadriven decision-making bridges extractive operations and public policy.
A key element of the model is Energy Transition Minerals, which emphasizes the renewed geopolitical and territorial importance of lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earth elements in the global shift toward clean technologies. The growth of these sectors opens up new mining frontiers—in the Andes, central Africa, and northern Canada—reshaping settlement patterns and putting fragile ecosystems at risk from extraction pressures (Petavratzi et al., 2022; Hund et al., 2020). The challenge is to strike a balance between critical mineral supply and environmental justice, water management, and community involvement.
The fourth element, Circular Urbanism, represents the model of resource recovery and post-extractive regeneration. By valorizing industrial residues, reusing infrastructures, and reimagining mining landscapes, cities can develop into regenerative socio-ecological systems. Initiatives such as urban mining, waste-to-resource programs, and brownfield rehabilitation showcase this shift from linear extraction to circular territorial metabolism (Gedam et al., 2021).
The ultimate stage, sustainability, embodies the normative goal of this framework. Feedback loops in the diagram show that progress toward sustainability relies on strengthening synergies among the digital, environmental, and social pillars. Successful paths are those where technological innovation, institutional capacity, and civic engagement come together to develop resilient, diversified, and low-carbon urban systems.
Overall, Figure 6 presents a comprehensive view of urban mining in the twenty-first century—highlighting how digital infrastructures, circular economies, and clean-energy supply chains are transforming not only extraction but also the identity and role of mining cities.
8. Conclusion
Mining-driven urbanization presents both a challenge and an opportunity for sustainable territorial development. While extractive activities have historically shaped the morphology, infrastructure, and labor dynamics of mining cities, their long-term viability depends on how well these regions can shift toward post-extractive economies. The current literature still lacks comprehensive frameworks capable of explaining how urban, ecological, and institutional systems interact under conditions of resource dependency and environmental stress.
A significant gap exists in understanding urban transition in mineral economies—that is, how mining cities change when extraction declines or stops. Future research should compare different pathways, focusing on which governance strategies encourage diversification, social inclusion, and environmental renewal. In this context, adaptive governance models present a useful conceptual approach: they highlight flexibility, participatory planning, and the ability to align policy tools across various levels—from local municipalities to national development plans.
Furthermore, developing advanced conceptual models of territorial feedback can help better understand the cyclical interactions among extraction, infrastructure, and spatial inequality. Such methods should combine remote sensing data, spatial analytics, and participatory foresight to predict land-use conflicts and support adaptive reuse of industrial landscapes. Building stronger interdisciplinary links is crucial for transforming mining cities from extractive enclaves into resilient, knowledge-driven urban systems.
Ultimately, the sustainable future of mining cities will rely not only on technological innovation or resource efficiency but also on governance coherence that aligns environmental restoration with economic diversification and citizen engagement. Integrating these aspects through adaptive and inclusive frameworks will be the main challenge—and opportunity—for research and policy in the coming decade.
References
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2016). Just sustainabilities: Development in an unequal world. Routledge.
Nwapi, C. (2017). Legal and institutional frameworks for community development agreements in the mining sector in Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.11.010
Arboleda, M. (2016). Spaces of extraction, metropolitan explosions: Planetary urbanization and the commodity boom in Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12290
Arellano-Yanguas, J. (2011). Aggravating the resource curse: Decentralisation, mining and conflict in Peru. Journal of Development Studies, 47(4), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220381003706478
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Regional data by industry and employment, 2023–2024. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics
Auty, R. M. (1993). Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422595
Azadi, M., Northey, S., Ali, S. H., & Edraki, M. (2020). Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience, 13(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3
Bebbington, A., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Sauls, L., Rogan, J., Agrawal, S., Gamboa, C., … Warnaars, X. (2018). Resource extraction and infrastructure threaten forest cover and community rights. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52), 13164–13173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812505115
Calderón-Seguel, M. (2024). Mining extractivism, commodification of nature and labour in the Atacama Desert. Journal of Latin American Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X241238715
Chien, S.-C., & Knoble, C. (2024). Uneven burdens: The intersection of brownfields, pollution, and socioeconomic disparities in New Jersey, USA. Sustainability, 16(23), 10535. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310535
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment. (2017). Implementing shared-use of mining infrastructure to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Columbia University. https://ccsi.columbia.edu/sites/ccsi.columbia.edu/files/content/docs/Implementing%20shareduse%20of%20mining%20infrastructure%20to%20achieve%20the%20Sustainable%20Development%20Goals.pdf
Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy. Economic Journal, 92(368), 825–848. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232670
Cowie, A. L., van Bogaert, R., & Singh, K. (2019). The scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science & Policy, 99, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.013
Devenin, V., & Bianchi, C. (2019). Characterizing a mining space: Analysis from case studies in Chile and Australia. Resources Policy, 62, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101402
Ediriweera, A., & Wiewiora, A. (2021). Barriers and enablers of technology adoption in the mining industry. Resources Policy, 73, 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102188
Frederiksen, T., & Himley, M. (2019). Tactics of dispossession: Access, power, and subjectivity at the extractive frontier. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12329
Gedam, V. V., Raut, R. D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Agrawal, N. (2021). Moving the circular economy forward in the mining industry: Challenges to closed-loop in an emerging economy. Resources Policy, 74, Article 102358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102358
Hilson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries. Resources Policy, 37(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.687352
Hilson, G. (2016). Farming, small-scale mining and gender relations in Africa: A critical overview. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(2), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.02.003
Hilson, G., & Hilson, A. (2022). Mine closure and post-mining legacies: A critical review of policy and practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Resources Policy, 78, 102894. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab043
Hilson, G., & McQuilken, J. (2014). Four decades of support for artisanal and small-scale mining in sub-Saharan Africa: A critical review. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.01.002
Hinojosa, L. (2020). Mining decentralisation and subnational development in the Andes. World Development, 136, 105108.
Hinojosa, L., Bebbington, A., Barrientos, C., & Bird, L. (2022). Resource frontiers and the urbanization of extraction in Latin America. World Development, 157, 105939.
Hund, K., La Porte, J., Schure, J., & Bonini, J. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank.
Jiao, W., Zhang, X., Li, C., & Guo, J. (2021). Sustainable transition of mining cities in China: Literature review and policy analysis. Resources Policy, 74, 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101867
Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators. Resources Policy, 57, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.002
Matlaba, V. J., dos Santos, J. F., Mota, J. A., da Cruz, L. N., Cruz, T. L., Belato, L. de S., Demétrio Neto, E. N., Dias, R. P., Vilarinho, C. C., Andrade, D. de S., Serrão, S. L. C., & Pires, V. de A. (2024). Local social perception of mining in Parauapebas and Canaã dos Carajás in the eastern Amazonia, Brazil. Resources Policy, 96, 105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105237
OECD. (2020). The circular economy in cities and regions: Synthesis report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-development/the-circular-economy-incities-and-regions-d1348aae4e.htm
Ovadia, J. S. (2016). Local content policies and petro-development in sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative analysis. Resources Policy, 49, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.003
Oyarzo, M., & Paredes, D. (2023). Shocks derived from mining windfalls and horizontal transfers: Exploring the permanent income hypothesis in Chilean municipalities from a spatial competition approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101468
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petavratzi, E., Sánchez-López, D., Hughes, A., Stacey, J., Ford, J., & Butcher, A. (2022). The impacts of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in achieving sustainable lithium supply in the Lithium Triangle. Mineral Economics, 35(3), 673–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-022-00332-4
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907
Prieto, M., Calderón-Seguel, M., Fragkou, M. C., & Fuster, R. (2022). The (not-so-free) Chilean water model: The case of the Antofagasta Region, Atacama Desert, Chile. The Extractive Industries and Society, 11, 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101081
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of “social license to operate” in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8
Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Sandström, J. (2021). Corporate paternalism on the rocks: A historical analysis of company towns in Sweden. Business History, 63(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2020.1771645
Savoia, A., & Sen, K. (2021). The political economy of the resource curse: A development perspective. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 13, 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100820-092612
Streule, M. (2023). Urban extractivism: Contesting megaprojects in Mexico City and reframing urban values. Urban Geography, 44(10), 1554–1574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2022.2146931
Strüver, A., & Kleemann, F. (2023). Resource-based city transitions: An empirical analysis of mining towns in sub-Saharan Africa. Urban Studies, 60(7), 1443–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221111234
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Turok, I., & McGranahan, G. (2019). Urbanisation and economic growth: The arguments and evidence for Africa and Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 31(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455747119890450
Udelsmann Rodrigues, C., Mususa, P., Büscher, K., & Cuvelier, J. (2021). Boomtown urbanization and rural-urban transformation in mining and conflict regions in Angola, the DRC and Zambia. Sustainability, 13(4), 2285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042285
United Nations Development Programme. (2023). Human Development Report 2023/2024. United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/developmentgoals/
Venables, A. J. (2016). Using natural resources for development: Why has it proven so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.161
Watkins, M. H. (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/139461
Yu, J., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2008). The sustainability of China’s major mining cities. Resources Policy, 33(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2007.10.001
Zhang, J., Yu, L., & Gong, Y. (2020). Recent evolution of research on industrial heritage in China and Western countries. Sustainability, 12(13), 5348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135348
¹PhD in Chemical Engineering
Federal University of Minas Gerais – UFMG, Department of Chemical Engineering
Belo Horizonte – MG – Brazil
E-mail: claretipereira@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8115-4279