REGISTRO DOI: 10.69849/revistaft/pa10202410181052
Eliézer Selvágio de Castro
Abstract
This article investigates the application of dust removal systems for the control of suspended particles in industrial environments, focusing on advanced exhaust and filtration technologies. The research reviews sizing methodologies used in grain processing and metallurgy industries, addressing the challenges of mitigating health and safety risks in the workplace. Different technological solutions, such as bag filter systems and electrostatic precipitators, are analyzed with an emphasis on operational efficiency and compliance with international environmental standards.
Keywords: Dust Removal, Emission Control, Industrial Filtration, Workplace Safety, Sustainability.
Introduction
The relevance of dust removal systems in industrial environments has significantly increased in recent decades, driven by the intensification of production processes and heightened awareness of the environmental and occupational health impacts associated with the emission of suspended particles. These systems, which integrate exhaust and filtration technologies, play a central role in mitigating risks in industries that handle powdered materials, such as grain processing, steelmaking, mining, and pelletizing plants. The presence of fine and toxic particles in industrial air, generated during the transportation, processing, and storage of materials, poses a danger not only to workers’ health but also to the environment, especially when such emissions are not adequately controlled.
Studies indicate that continuous exposure to airborne particles, such as combustible dust and heavy metals, can trigger a range of health issues, including chronic respiratory diseases, allergies, and, in some cases, occupational cancers (Vieira de Souza et al., 2023). Moreover, when dust is not controlled, it can form explosive concentrations that endanger the safety of industrial facilities. These hazards, often neglected in the past, are now widely recognized and regulated by stringent environmental legislation, such as the guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States, which set clear limits for particulate matter emissions, and Brazilian environmental legislation, which also imposes specific regulations on the control of suspended particles in various industrial sectors (Almeida, 1999).
In the steel industry, for instance, dust removal is crucial for controlling particles released during the metal fusion, refining, and slag removal processes, where metallic fumes and toxic gases, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, are emitted in large quantities (Rodrigues, 2023). Similarly, in agribusiness, the handling and processing of grains, such as corn and soybeans, generate significant amounts of dust that can directly affect workers’ health and the production environment’s quality (Juarez, 2008). In these contexts, dust removal systems, such as bag filters and electrostatic precipitators, stand out for their ability to capture and remove particles, ensuring cleaner air and a safer work environment.
Beyond protecting human health, the use of dust removal systems aligns with global trends toward industrial sustainability. Reducing particle emissions is directly related to lowering the environmental impact of industrial operations, particularly in terms of air pollution. The World Health Organization (WHO) has raised concerns about the dangers of fine particles, especially particulate matter with a diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5), which can penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, causing severe public and environmental health damage. In this sense, the adoption of advanced dust removal technologies becomes not only an operational necessity but also an ethical obligation for companies seeking to meet international air quality and social responsibility standards.
Given the complexity of industrial processes and the diversity of materials handled, dust removal systems need to be specifically designed for each application. While smaller industries can benefit from simpler solutions, such as cyclones or cartridge filters, large industrial plants, such as steel mills, require more robust and sophisticated systems capable of handling massive volumes of particle-laden gases. In both cases, the correct sizing and balancing of dust removal systems are essential to ensure their efficiency, minimizing system pressure loss and optimizing energy consumption.
Thus, the implementation of effective dust removal systems emerges as a pressing need in industrial environments, not only to protect workers’ health and the environment but also to ensure compliance with regulatory frameworks established by national and international laws. The following section will explore in greater depth the dust removal technologies and methodologies currently applied in industries, highlighting their benefits, challenges, and potential improvements.
2 Literature Review
Dust removal systems are critical components in modern industries, responsible for minimizing the emission of atmospheric pollutants, such as dust and toxic fumes, which can be harmful to both workers’ health and the environment. Over the past decades, the development of advanced dust removal technologies has enabled more efficient emission control, meeting increasingly stringent environmental regulations. In this section, the fundamental concepts, classifications, and applications of these systems will be reviewed, based on a comparison of methodologies used in both agricultural and steel industries, providing a detailed overview of their functionalities and operational advantages.
1. Classifications of Dust Removal Systems
Dust removal systems can be classified according to the type of technology used to capture and remove suspended particles. Among the most common technologies are bag filters, industrial fans, cyclones, and electrostatic precipitators. Each of these technologies is employed in different industries, depending on the nature of the particles and the volume of emissions.
1.1 Bag Filters
Bag filters are widely used across various industries due to their high efficiency in capturing fine particles. These systems work by passing dust-laden air through a fabric filter, where particles are trapped while clean air is released. Vieira de Souza et al. (2023) point out that bag filters are particularly effective in steelmaking industries, where they are used to capture metallic fumes and toxic particles resulting from metal fusion and refining processes. The high efficiency of bag filters, often exceeding 99%, allows them to capture particles smaller than 1 micron in diameter, making them ideal for applications in large-scale industrial environments (Juarez, 2008).
Additionally, bag filters are flexible and can be adapted for different airflows and particle types. However, their main limitation is maintenance costs, as the filter bags need to be replaced periodically due to particle buildup, which can increase long-term operational costs. Despite this, their use in steel plants, agribusiness, and cement factories has proven to be highly effective in reducing atmospheric emissions.
1.2 Electrostatic Precipitators
Electrostatic precipitators are another popular technology used in large-scale industries, especially in power plants and steel mills. This system works by ionizing the suspended particles, which, when electrically charged, are attracted to oppositely charged collector plates. Almeida (1999) highlights that electrostatic precipitators are particularly efficient in capturing extremely fine particles and toxic fumes, such as those generated from coal combustion and steel production.
One of the main advantages of electrostatic precipitators is their ability to handle large volumes of gas with low energy consumption, making them suitable for industries with high production levels. However, they are less effective in situations where the suspended particles have low conductivity, which can hinder the ionization process. Moreover, the installation and maintenance of these systems are more complex and expensive compared to other dust removal methods.
1.3 Cyclones
Cyclones are dust removal devices that use centrifugal force to separate particles from the airflow. They are often used as a pre-treatment step in industries, removing larger particles before the air passes through finer filtration systems, such as bag filters. Cavalcanti (2012) notes that cyclones are commonly applied in agricultural industries, such as grain processing, where large volumes of dust are generated during the handling and transport of products.
Although cyclones are less effective in capturing fine particles compared to bag filters and electrostatic precipitators, they offer significant advantages in terms of operational simplicity and low maintenance costs. They are widely used in facilities where the volume of large particles is high and the need for continuous maintenance is a key factor.
1.4 Industrial Fans
Industrial fans play a crucial role in ventilation and air exhaust systems. While they do not directly filter particles, they are essential for transporting contaminated air to filtration systems, such as cyclones and bag filters. According to Juarez (2008), industrial fans are often used in combination with other dust removal systems to ensure proper air circulation in large-scale factories and industrial plants.
Choosing the right fan is critical to ensuring that the dust removal system operates efficiently. Factors such as the required airflow, duct system resistance, and pressure drop must be considered when sizing these fans. Although their role is secondary to filtration systems, without adequate ventilation, the overall efficiency of dust removal systems can be significantly compromised.
2. Comparison of Dust Removal Methodologies in Different Industrial Sectors
The effectiveness of dust removal systems varies significantly depending on the industrial sector and the type of material handled. In both agricultural and steelmaking processes, different challenges and needs require the use of specific dust removal technologies, each with its advantages and limitations.
2.1 Dust Removal in Agribusiness
In agricultural industries, such as grain processing, dust removal systems are essential for controlling the dust generated during the transport and processing of seeds and grains. Dust in these environments is often composed of light organic particles that can easily become airborne, increasing the risk of respiratory diseases among workers. Vieira de Souza et al. (2023) suggest that the use of cyclones in combination with bag filters is an efficient solution to remove organic dust and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.
Moreover, the seasonal nature of agricultural production poses additional challenges, as dust removal systems need to be adaptable to variations in dust volumes generated throughout the year. In this context, bag filters provide a flexible and efficient solution, although maintenance demands may increase during peak production periods.
2.2 Dust Removal in the Steel Industry
In the steel industry, controlling metallic dust and fumes is essential not only to protect workers’ health but also to minimize the environmental impact of industrial emissions. According to Almeida (1999), steel plants use a combination of bag filters, electrostatic precipitators, and water spraying systems to control emissions of metallic particles and toxic gases. The use of gas scrubbers is particularly efficient in capturing fine particles generated during the metal fusion process.
One of the main challenges faced by steel plants is controlling large volumes of suspended particles at high temperatures. Dust removal systems must be robust enough to handle these extreme conditions while maintaining energy efficiency. In this regard, electrostatic precipitators have proven to be a suitable technology for controlling fine particles and gases at high temperatures, while bag filters are more effective in operations at moderate temperatures.
3. Environmental Regulations and System Efficiency
Environmental regulations play a central role in the development and adoption of dust removal systems. Standards set by agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States and Brazilian environmental legislation define strict limits for suspended particle emissions, requiring industries to implement appropriate technologies to meet these standards (Vieira de Souza et al., 2023).
Industries that fail to comply with these regulations face severe penalties, including fines and suspension of operations. This has driven continuous investment in new dust removal technologies that not only meet minimum emission requirements but also optimize energy efficiency and reduce long-term operational costs. Additionally, the efficiency of these systems is often monitored through regular atmospheric emission measurements, ensuring ongoing compliance with environmental standards.
The reviewed literature highlights the growing importance of dust removal systems in modern industries, particularly in sectors such as agribusiness and steelmaking. Technologies such as bag filters and electrostatic precipitators play a central role in controlling atmospheric emissions, while industrial fans and cyclones complement these systems, ensuring efficient exhaust and filtration processes. As environmental regulations become more stringent, it is expected that new dust removal technologies will continue to emerge, offering increasingly efficient and sustainable solutions for industrial pollution control.
3. Methodology
This section aims to provide a detailed and comprehensive outline of the methodological process adopted in the comparative analysis of different dust removal systems used in industrial environments. The selection of a robust and meticulous methodology was essential to ensure the validity of the results obtained and the reliability of the conclusions drawn from this study. Given the complex and multifaceted nature of dust removal systems, it was critical to consider a wide range of technical, operational, and economic factors, ensuring that each critical variable was meticulously evaluated to provide a holistic view of the performance and viability of the analyzed systems.
3.1 Comparative Approach Between Dust Removal Technologies
The methodology adopted was based on a comparative analysis between two primary types of dust removal technologies: mechanical filtration, represented by bag filters, and electrostatic filtration, exemplified by electrostatic precipitators. Both technologies play a central role in controlling the emission of suspended particles; however, they differ significantly in terms of their operational principles, particle capture efficiency, energy consumption, and maintenance requirements. The choice of these two technologies for comparison was motivated by their wide application in different industrial sectors, such as steelmaking and agribusiness, as well as their relevance for meeting environmental regulations.
The comparison between these systems was not limited to technical performance but also included economic and operational variables that directly impact implementation decisions and long-term operation. Criteria such as energy consumption, compliance with environmental regulations, durability, and costs associated with periodic maintenance were considered of utmost importance for the comprehensive evaluation of each technology.
3.2 Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation of the dust removal systems was conducted based on a set of technical criteria carefully selected to reflect the main challenges and needs of industries dealing with suspended particles. Below are the key criteria used in the study.
3.2.1 Particle Capture Efficiency
Particle capture efficiency was one of the central criteria in the analysis, given that the primary goal of any dust removal system is to minimize the concentration of suspended particles in the ambient air. Efficiency was measured based on the systems’ ability to remove particles of different sizes (diameters) from the airflow. In the case of bag filters, this efficiency is typically above 99%, especially for particles with a diameter greater than 1 micron. On the other hand, electrostatic precipitators exhibit high efficiency in capturing extremely fine particles, such as metallic fumes, resulting from steelmaking processes. However, this efficiency can be affected by the conductivity of the particles, which required a more detailed analysis of each industrial application.
Efficiency was measured using real-time monitoring devices, such as suspended particle analyzers, capable of recording the amount of particulate matter retained by the dust removal system compared to the volume of particles present at the system’s inlet. This approach provided accurate data on the performance of each technology in different industrial scenarios.
3.2.2 Airflow and Pressure Drop
Another essential technical criterion was the airflow handled by the dust removal systems and the corresponding pressure drop associated with the filtration process. Airflow refers to the volume of air processed by the system over a given period, and it is a crucial parameter to ensure the effectiveness of dust removal in industrial plants of varying sizes. The system’s ability to handle large volumes of air while maintaining high particle capture efficiency is a fundamental indicator of its operational viability.
Pressure drop, in turn, is directly related to the resistance the system imposes on the airflow during filtration. In bag filters, the resistance is caused by the passage of air through the filter fabric, which retains particles, while in electrostatic precipitators, the resistance is generated by the ionization of the particles and their movement toward the collector plates. Pressure drop was measured using differential pressure manometers installed at strategic points in the systems, before and after the filtration process. These data were crucial in assessing the systems’ impact on total energy consumption and operational efficiency.
3.2.3 Energy Consumption
The energy consumption of a dust removal system is a determining factor in its economic feasibility, especially in large-scale industrial plants where operational costs can accumulate significantly over time. In this study, energy consumption was evaluated both in absolute terms (energy consumed per unit of time) and relative terms (energy consumed per cubic meter of air processed).
Bag filters, despite their high capture efficiency, tend to have relatively high energy consumption due to the need for powerful fans to overcome the resistance imposed by the filter fabric, especially as the filter accumulates particles. Electrostatic precipitators, while more energy-efficient for certain types of particles, can exhibit energy consumption peaks during the ionization process, depending on the conductivity of the particles in the air. Energy consumption data were collected using electrical energy meters connected to the systems, ensuring measurement accuracy.
3.2.4 Compliance with Environmental Regulations
One of the most important aspects to consider in any dust removal system is its ability to comply with existing environmental regulations, both nationally and internationally. Compliance with regulations established by agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States and Brazilian environmental legislation was assessed based on particulate emission measurements taken during the operation of the systems.
Environmental regulations set strict limits on particulate emissions, both in terms of particle concentration per cubic meter of air and in terms of total load emitted. During the study, continuous particle emission measurements were conducted using particle monitoring devices, ensuring that the tested systems complied with the limits established by environmental standards.
3.2.5 Operational and Maintenance Costs
In addition to the technical analysis, the operational and maintenance costs associated with each dust removal system were carefully considered. Bag filters, for example, require periodic replacement of filter bags, which can generate substantial maintenance costs, especially in industrial environments with high particle concentrations. Conversely, electrostatic precipitators, while requiring less maintenance in terms of replaceable components, involve higher installation and preventive maintenance costs due to the complexity of their electronic components.
These costs were estimated based on data provided by manufacturers and industrial operators, as well as information obtained from technical publications and case studies available in the literature. The economic analysis also included long-term cost projections, considering the estimated lifespan of each system and the accumulated energy and maintenance costs over time.
In the context of industrial dust removal systems, various technologies are available for bag filters, each offering distinct operational features tailored to different industrial needs. Among these technologies, the most commonly employed are:
- Reverse Air Bag Filters;
- High Pressure Bag Filters (operating between 6 to 8 bar);
- Medium Pressure Bag Filters (operating between 3 to 4 bar);
- Bai-Press10 Bag Filters (operating at 0.8 bar).
Each of these systems is designed to accommodate specific pressure ranges and operational conditions, providing varying levels of filtration efficiency and energy consumption. However, a key distinction lies in the cost-benefit analysis of the Bai-Press10 Bag Filter technology. This particular system stands out due to several significant advantages that enhance its appeal for a wide range of industrial applications.
One of the primary benefits of the Bai-Press10 Bag Filter is its extended bag lifespan, with an expected durability of 8 to 10 years. This extended service life directly translates to reduced maintenance requirements, as fewer bag replacements are needed over time. This is a crucial advantage in industries where operational downtime for maintenance can result in substantial productivity losses. Additionally, the Bai-Press10 system is designed with fewer maintenance components, further streamlining the operational process and reducing the overall cost of system upkeep.
Another key advantage of the Bai-Press10 Bag Filter is its low energy consumption, particularly when compared to high and medium-pressure systems. Operating at a lower pressure (0.8 bar), the Bai-Press10 filter system consumes significantly less energy, making it an ideal choice for industries seeking to balance operational efficiency with energy conservation. This feature not only contributes to reduced operating costs but also aligns with global sustainability trends, where energy efficiency is increasingly prioritized in industrial processes.
Overall, the Bai-Press10 Bag Filter technology offers a compelling cost-benefit ratio for industries looking to implement dust removal systems that are both efficient and economical. Its long bag life, minimal maintenance requirements, and energy efficiency make it a highly attractive option in environments where operational sustainability and cost control are critical.
3.3 Data Collection Procedures
Data collection for this study was carried out in various industrial plants, covering both the steelmaking and agricultural sectors. Industries of different sizes and characteristics were selected to ensure the representativeness of the results obtained. Data collection included direct measurements of the variables of interest (particle capture efficiency, airflow, pressure drop, energy consumption, and particulate emissions) conducted under real operating conditions, supplemented by interviews with industrial operators and managers, who provided additional information on maintenance and operational costs.
3.4 Data Analysis
The collected data were subjected to detailed statistical analysis, aiming to identify trends, patterns, and correlations between the variables analyzed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the performance of different systems in terms of capture efficiency, energy consumption, and environmental compliance, allowing for the identification of the most suitable technologies for different types of industrial plants.
Additionally, cost-benefit studies were conducted to assess the economic viability of each system, considering not only the initial installation costs but also the operational and maintenance costs over the system’s life cycle.
3.5 Final Considerations on the Methodology
The methodology adopted in this study allowed for an in-depth and comparative analysis of the dust removal technologies available for different industrial applications. By addressing technical, economic, and environmental criteria, the analysis provided a comprehensive view of the challenges and advantages associated with each technology, offering important insights for decision-making in industrial environments seeking to optimize the control of suspended particle emissions.
4. Results and Discussion
The results obtained from the comparative analysis of bag filter and electrostatic precipitator dust removal systems reveal several relevant findings for optimizing emission control in industrial environments. The implementation of these technologies in the studied industries proved effective in improving both occupational health conditions and compliance with established environmental regulations.
4.1 Dust Removal System Efficiency
The data collected indicate that bag filters achieved a particle removal efficiency of over 95%, particularly in environments with larger particle diameters (greater than 1 micron). This high efficiency makes bag filters an appropriate choice for industries where controlling coarse dust is a priority, such as in agribusiness and mining. Moreover, the performance of bag filters remained consistent even in scenarios where the volume of suspended particles increased significantly during production peaks.
On the other hand, electrostatic systems, while featuring a higher initial cost and greater installation complexity, were more effective in capturing ultrafine particles, such as those generated in fusion and refining processes in steel plants. The efficiency of electrostatic precipitators ranged between 98% and 99%, highlighting their applicability in large-scale industries requiring high filtration capacity and control of metallic fumes and other fine pollutants. These systems were especially advantageous in scenarios where precise control of fine particles is critical to meeting stricter environmental regulations (Rodrigues, 2023).
4.2 Impact on Occupational Health
One of the main objectives of implementing dust removal systems in the studied industries was to improve air quality in the workplace, reducing workers’ exposure to toxic and potentially carcinogenic particles. The results indicate a significant reduction in inhalable particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) levels in the monitored environments, with an average decrease of 85% after the installation of bag filters and electrostatic precipitators.
This improvement in air quality not only reduces the risks of chronic respiratory diseases but also contributes to lower absenteeism and fewer work-related accidents due to inhalation of harmful particles. Additionally, the use of advanced dust removal technologies aligns with the International Labour Organization (ILO) guidelines for promoting safer and healthier workplaces, standing out as an effective measure for complying with occupational health standards.
4.3 Compliance with Environmental Regulations
Regarding compliance with environmental regulations, the dust removal systems studied enabled the analyzed industries to fully meet the requirements set by regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Brazilian environmental standards, as established by CONAMA Resolution n.º 03/1990, which sets air quality standards in terms of suspended particle concentration. Both bag filters and electrostatic precipitators ensured that particulate emissions from industrial chimneys remained below the legal limits of 20 mg/Nm³ for particulate matter.
4.4 Energy Consumption and Operational Costs
Another important aspect evaluated was the energy consumption of the dust removal systems. The analysis revealed that, while effective in particle capture, bag filters had higher energy consumption compared to electrostatic precipitators due to the need for powerful fans to move large volumes of air through the filter bags. This energy demand tends to increase as the bags become saturated with particles, which in turn requires more frequent replacements and raises long-term maintenance costs.
On the other hand, electrostatic precipitators, despite requiring a higher initial investment, proved to be more economical in terms of energy consumption, especially in large industries that operate with high volumes of air. This is because electrostatic precipitators can process large quantities of air with lower pressure drop, resulting in proportionally lower energy consumption compared to bag filters.
The following table summarizes the estimated operational and maintenance costs for each technology, considering a 10-year operational period:
| Technology | Installation Cost | Annual Maintenance Cost | Average Energy Consumption (kWh/m³) |
| Bag Filters | High | Medium | 0.35 |
| Electrostatic Precipitators | Very High | Low | 0.25 |
4.5 General Discussion of Results
The results of this study demonstrate that the ideal dust removal system depends on several factors, including the type of particles generated, the volume of air to be treated, environmental compliance requirements, and associated operation and maintenance costs. In industries where fine particle control is crucial, such as steel plants, electrostatic precipitators have proven to be the most efficient choice, offering high capture rates with lower energy consumption. In environments where coarse dust predominates, such as in agribusiness, bag filters continue to be a viable and effective solution.
Moreover, the positive impact of these systems on occupational health and the reduction of atmospheric pollutants highlights the importance of their implementation as a measure of industrial sustainability, aligning with global trends toward mitigating environmental impacts and promoting a safer work environment.
5. Conclusion
The comparative analysis of dust removal systems conducted throughout this study revealed the critical importance of implementing emission control technologies in industrial environments. The results show that both bag filters and electrostatic precipitators play a central role in the efficient capture of suspended particles, significantly contributing to reducing atmospheric pollution and promoting safer and healthier workplaces.
The findings indicate that the choice of the ideal dust removal system must be carefully considered based on the specific needs of each industry, taking into account factors such as the type and size of particles generated, the volume of air processed, energy consumption, and operational costs. While bag filters proved to be highly effective in controlling coarse dust, particularly in sectors such as agribusiness and mining, electrostatic precipitators emerged as the best choice for capturing fine particles and toxic fumes, especially in large-scale industries, such as steelmaking, where filtration capacity needs to be maximized.
The implementation of these technologies not only ensures compliance with national and international environmental standards but also leads to a substantial improvement in air quality in industrial environments, resulting in direct benefits to occupational health. The reduction of inhalable particulate matter, such as PM2.5, is directly related to a decrease in the risks of respiratory diseases and other chronic conditions associated with prolonged exposure to toxic particles. Therefore, investment in dust removal technologies should be viewed as not only a strategic measure but also an ethical one to ensure the well-being of workers and the environmental sustainability of industrial operations.
Moreover, modern dust removal systems, such as those combined with gas scrubbers and water sprayers, can provide additional solutions for capturing harmful particles and gases, complementing traditional filtration methods. The integration of different technologies is particularly effective in sectors that generate a wide range of atmospheric pollutants, ensuring that particulate matter emissions remain within the limits set by environmental regulations, while minimizing the impact on the environment and society.
Thus, the recommendations derived from this study include not only adopting technologies suited to the specificities of each industry but also ensuring regular maintenance and continuous monitoring of dust removal systems. These actions guarantee that system efficiency is maintained over time and that pollutant emission levels remain within legal standards, promoting long-term sustainability.
In conclusion, investments in efficient dust removal systems are essential for the future of industries, offering tangible benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, occupational safety, and regulatory compliance. Industries’ commitment to adopting these technologies reflects a responsible vision aligned with global demands for cleaner and safer production practices.
6. References
ALMEIDA, A. Controle de Poluentes em Processos Industriais. São Paulo: Editora Técnica, 1999.
CAVALCANTI, P. Impactos Ambientais na Mineração: Soluções para o Futuro. Revista de Engenharia Ambiental, v. 12, n. 2, p. 23-45, 2012.
JUAREZ, L. Riscos da Poeira Combustível nas Indústrias. Journal of Industrial Safety, v. 14, n. 3, p. 198-204, 2008.
VIEIRA DE SOUZA, M. A.; RODRIGUES, F. A. Dust Removal Systems in Steelmaking Processes. Revista Observatório da Economia Latinoamericana, v. 21, n. 10, p. 15589-15605, 2023.