THE IMPACT OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES ON WORKERS AND SOCIETY: A CALL FOR PREVENTIVE ACTION

REGISTRO DOI: 10.69849/revistaft/dt10202212272221


Natalia Tardino Scandelai


Abstract

Occupational diseases present a critical challenge to both workers and organizations, impacting health, productivity, and the economy. These diseases, caused or aggravated by working conditions, include musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory issues, and mental health problems. The consequences of these illnesses are multifaceted, affecting workers’ physical and psychological well-being, reducing productivity, and incurring significant costs for employers due to increased absenteeism and medical expenses. Chronic pain, stress, and uncertainty about the future can lead to mental health conditions like anxiety and depression, further compromising workers’ quality of life and financial stability. Preventive measures such as ergonomic improvements, health and safety training, and regular health monitoring are crucial in reducing the occurrence of occupational diseases. Early detection is vital for minimizing the severity of these conditions and preventing long-term health issues. The socioeconomic impact of these diseases extends beyond individual workers, affecting their families and communities, and generating significant costs for the healthcare system and social security. Research underscores the importance of understanding the economic and social consequences of occupational diseases and the need for effective preventive strategies. By implementing comprehensive risk management systems, improving healthcare funding, and developing policies that address both direct and indirect costs, the impact of these diseases can be mitigated. The overall health of workers should be a priority for organizations, as a safe and healthy work environment leads to greater productivity, employee satisfaction, and reduced healthcare costs. In conclusion, investing in preventive measures and improving working conditions benefits not only individual workers but also society, promoting a healthier, more productive workforce.

Keywords: Occupational diseases; Preventive measures; Worker health; Productivity loss; Socioeconomic impact.

Occupational diseases represent a significant challenge for both employers and employees, directly impacting productivity and overall quality of life. These illnesses, which result from or are worsened by workplace conditions, encompass a variety of health issues, including musculoskeletal disorders, respiratory diseases, and mental health problems. These conditions undermine the physical and psychological well-being of workers.

A primary consequence of these illnesses in the workplace is reduced productivity. Chronic pain, fatigue, and limited mobility hinder workers’ ability to perform tasks efficiently, leading to delays, increased absenteeism, and added workload for other employees. In addition, the disruptions caused by frequent absences and ongoing medical treatment further affect the workflow, generating additional operational costs for businesses.

Beyond professional setbacks, occupational diseases severely impact workers’ quality of life. The physical discomfort experienced, combined with the stress and uncertainty surrounding the future, can give rise to psychological issues such as anxiety and depression. The inability to work may also lead to financial hardships, affecting not only the individual but their entire family.

To mitigate these impacts, it is essential for companies to implement preventive strategies such as ergonomic improvements, health and safety training, scheduled breaks, and the promotion of healthy lifestyles. Regular monitoring of employees’ health can help identify potential risks early, preventing the worsening of working conditions.

Figure 1: Hierarchy of Controls.
Source: Journal of Petroleum Technology.

Given this context, it is crucial for companies to invest in prevention and improvements in the work environment. A focus on safety and well-being benefits both the productivity of businesses and the health of their workers. A safe and healthy workplace fosters a more engaged, satisfied, and efficient workforce.

Research by Bakirov et al. (2022) explored the effects of chronic lower back pain (LBP) on the lives of workers in harsh conditions, such as those found in metallurgical industries. The study, which involved a comprehensive assessment of the working conditions and health of 132 workers, revealed that those in occupations exposed to harmful factors—particularly wire-drawing professions and operators of intra-factory vehicles—reported the highest pain levels. Additionally, degenerative changes in the lumbar spine and dysfunctions in the lower back were observed. The study highlighted the correlation between early detection of musculoskeletal disorders and a decline in workers’ quality of life, emphasizing the importance of using specific pain assessment tools and early rehabilitation strategies.

In another study, Flouris et al. (2018) analyzed the health and productivity impacts of occupational heat stress, which they identified as a growing public health concern. Their meta-analysis, covering 111 studies from 30 countries, showed that workers exposed to heat stress were at a significantly higher risk of suffering from occupational heat strain. The study also found that dehydration and an increased risk of kidney diseases were prevalent among workers exposed to extreme temperatures. These findings underline the need for coordinated international efforts to address the impacts of heat stress, particularly as global temperatures rise due to climate change.

Schulte et al. (2017) emphasized that the true burden of occupational diseases and injuries, in terms of morbidity, mortality, disability, and economic costs, is often underestimated. The authors propose a broader approach to understanding this issue, considering the impact on workers, their families, the employer, and society at large. They advocate for a more comprehensive evaluation of the relationship between work and health issues over the entire working life and emphasize the need for continued research and improved surveillance systems to guide better public policies.

Mucci et al. (2018) focused on the occupational risks faced by migrant workers, who are often employed in hazardous and physically demanding jobs in sectors like construction, heavy industry, and agriculture. These workers face multiple health risks, including infectious diseases and chronic conditions like cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. The study highlights the importance of occupational medicine interventions to prevent work-related illnesses and promote healthier environments for this vulnerable workforce.

Hulshof et al. (2020) studied the prevalence of exposure to ergonomic risk factors, such as repetitive motions and awkward postures, which contribute to musculoskeletal diseases like osteoarthritis. Their findings underscore the need for better data and further research on the burden of diseases related to ergonomic risks, especially as these conditions are highly prevalent across different industries worldwide.

Finally, Yokoyama et al. (2013) highlighted the profound socioeconomic impact of occupational diseases and injuries. According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), these conditions result in approximately 2.34 million deaths annually, with the majority caused by work-related diseases. The ILO stresses the importance of adequate prevention strategies, as the failure to prevent these illnesses leads to significant costs for workers, businesses, and society, particularly through productivity loss and strain on social security systems. The study calls for research into the economic and social impacts of work-related diseases and emphasizes the need for effective prevention strategies, proper healthcare funding, and risk management systems to alleviate these consequences.

In conclusion, occupational diseases represent a significant, multifaceted challenge that affects not only the physical and psychological well-being of workers but also the economic health of organizations and society as a whole. The studies examined illustrate the wide-ranging consequences of these diseases, from the direct impact on workers’ health—manifested in chronic pain, mental health issues, and reduced quality of life—to the broader economic effects, such as increased absenteeism, healthcare costs, and a decrease in overall productivity. Whether caused by poor working conditions, physical demands, or environmental factors, occupational diseases have a far-reaching impact on individuals and communities, as well as on businesses and the economy.

The research highlights the crucial need for comprehensive preventive measures to address the root causes of these diseases. Interventions such as ergonomic improvements, workplace health monitoring, training programs, and regular health assessments are essential to reducing the incidence and severity of work-related illnesses. Moreover, the importance of early detection cannot be overstated, as timely interventions can prevent the worsening of conditions, reduce the burden on healthcare systems, and improve the long-term well-being of workers.

Beyond physical health, the emotional and psychological toll of occupational diseases should not be overlooked. Workers facing chronic pain or mental health challenges due to their job conditions often experience anxiety, depression, and stress, which can lead to a further deterioration in their overall quality of life. These factors extend beyond the individual worker, affecting their families, communities, and broader societal structures, underscoring the necessity for a holistic approach to occupational health.

Furthermore, it is essential for policymakers, employers, and health professionals to recognize the socioeconomic implications of occupational diseases and to invest in long-term strategies to mitigate these effects. This includes improving working conditions, ensuring adequate healthcare funding, and developing robust risk management systems that address both direct and indirect costs associated with work-related injuries and illnesses. Research and evidence-based policies must continue to evolve to keep pace with emerging health risks, especially in the context of climate change, technological advancements, and the global shift toward more service-oriented industries.

Ultimately, the creation of a safe and healthy work environment should be a shared responsibility that benefits everyone involved. For employers, it translates into enhanced productivity, reduced costs, and improved employee satisfaction. For workers, it means better health, security, and a higher quality of life. By prioritizing the prevention of occupational diseases and the health and safety of workers, we can foster a more sustainable, equitable, and prosperous future for both individuals and organizations alike. Through sustained efforts, research, and collaboration across sectors, it is possible to reduce the burden of occupational diseases and promote a culture of well-being in the workplace, ensuring that workers are not only productive but also thriving in their roles.

References

Bakirov, A., Salavatova, L., Abdrakhmanova, E., Masyagutova, L., Alakaeva, R., Gabdulkhaeva, E., & Khafizova, A. (2022). Diagnostic methods of the impact on the life’s quality of lumbar pain syndromes in workers of harmful industries. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2022-62-4-259-265.

Flouris, A., Dinas, P., Ioannou, L., Nybo, L., Havenith, G., Kenny, G., & Kjellstrom, T. (2018). Workers’ health and productivity under occupational heat strain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Planetary health, 2 12, e521-e531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30237-7.

Hulshof, C., Pega, F., Neupane, S., Van Der Molen, H., Colosio, C., Daams, J., Descatha, A., Kc, P., Kuijer, P., Mandić-Rajčević, S., Masci, F., Morgan, R., Nygård, C., Oakman, J., Proper, K., Solovieva, S., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2021). The prevalence of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environment international, 146, 106157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106157.

Mucci, N., Traversini, V., Giorgi, G., Garzaro, G., Fiz-Perez, J., Campagna, M., Rapisarda, V., Tommasi, E., Montalti, M., & Arcangeli, G. (2018). Migrant Workers and Physical Health: An Umbrella Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11010232.

Schulte, P., Pana-Cryan, R., Schnorr, T., Schill, A., Guerin, R., Felknor, S., & Wagner, G. (2017). An Approach to Assess the Burden of Work-Related Injury, Disease, and Distress. American journal of public health, 107 7, 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303765.

Yokoyama, K., Iijima, S., Ito, H., & Kan, M. (2013). The Socio-Economic Impact of Occupational Diseases and Injuries. Industrial Health, 51, 459 – 461. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.500.